Archive for month: February, 2019

Does the mission/purpose of your company make you feel your job is important? How does that relate to your motivation at work?

You are the boss

Because the essay needs to apply the theories and ideas from the article, notes and book “FBATR”, I post the parts of theses stuff to you. I think you should read and understand these information from these documents then write the essay. The “motivation” appeared in the article. Inner Work Life. On page 76. I post one note from class. I think it should works for the essay. Then, I post some chapters from the book. These chapters including some important theories, I hope that works to you.

Theory in the text book. 1.Talent: Talents are rare and special.
Example1: Take nursing as an example. Working with a large health care provider, Callup had a chance to study some of the best nurses in the world. When nurse perform the same injection on the same population of one hundred patients. The average nurses introduced themselves with a brisk, “Oh, don’t worry, this won’t hurt a bit,” and then plunged in the needle with businesslike efficiency. The best nurses opted for a very different approach. They were just as efficient with the needle, but they set the stage rather more carefully, “This is going to hurt a little,” they admitted. “But’ don’t worry, I’ll be as gentle as I can” So, the patients think they more like the “best nurse”
These nurse were blessed with the relating talent empathy. They knew the injection would hurt, and each of them, in their own style, felt compelled to share that knowledge with the patients.

2. Even some roles are easy, they still required talent.
Example: “Let’s take hotel housekeepers as an example” Key word: put yourself in their shoes.
We shouldn’t devalue housekeepers. Anyone can probably clean a hotel room once in a while, but great housekeepers are special. Gallup asked best housekeeper “how do you know if a room is clean?” They said that the last thing they did before leaving a room was to lie on the guest’s bed and turn on the ceiling fan. Because that is the first thing that a guest will do after a long day out. They will walk into the room, flop down on the bed, and turn on the fan. If dust comes off the top of the fan, then no matter how sparkling clean the rest of the room was, the gust might think it was as dirty as the top of the fan.”

1
BA 352
Managing Individual and Team Performance
“You’re the Boss” Assignment
Due: July 19, 2013 at the beginning of class.
Purpose:
This assignment is an opportunity for you to assess the reality of different ideas we work with this semester and to apply them in a real-world setting. Interviewing employees about their experiences in the workplace and reporting on your findings will allow you to reflect on the degree to which theories reflect reality, and test your skills in developing a plan to motivate a group of actual employees. In this report, you will need to think about and articulate how the material from class explains (or fails to explain) the motivation and performance of employees in the working world, and how you can exploit the concepts and theories we will discuss in class to increase employee performance.
The Interview:
For this assignment, you will be required to conduct three interviews with three individuals who currently work at three different organizations and write an essay about motivation at work. Specifically, you must contact three employees that each currently work at an organization and set up a time to interview them in-person. At least two of your three interviewees must be currently working full-time, and the other one must work at least ten hours per week. In these interviews, you will need to develop a good understanding of what motivates each of the three employees at work.
When you contact your interviewee, make sure to let him or her know that the interview will last approximately 30 – 45 minutes. During that initial conversation, you should describe the assignment in general and give him or her a sense of the issues you wish to cover in the interview (see attached list of questions). You should also make your interviewees aware that you will be taking notes during the interview. Let them know the notes will only be used in completing your analysis. No information provided will be used outside the educational purposes of this class.
Important: Your interviews must be in person. You should be thoughtful about arranging a time that is convenient for your interviewees. If you say the interview will last 30 – 45 minutes, do not go over that amount unless individuals express interest in having the interview continue beyond the designated time limit. Do not expect these working employees to accommodate you. You need to plan well enough in advance in order to accommodate their schedule. DO NOT WAIT TO MAKE YOUR CONTACT AND CONDUCT INTERVIEWS—START NOW!
I have provided a general interview template you can use if you wish, but you have complete freedom to ask whatever questions interest you as well. You should feel free to probe more deeply and ask additional questions that seem reasonable in the context. Be flexible! In other words, go with the conversation when needed and then go back to the questions provided only if you feel like you need to for some specific reason.
2
The essay:
After you have conducted the three interviews you will then write a three-section essay that (1) describes what motivates each employee at work, (2) briefly gives your thoughts on why each employee differs (if at all) from the other two in terms of what motivates them at work, and (3) explains what you would do, if you were the manager of a group containing all three employees, to increase the group’s motivation on the job. You should apply the theories and ideas discussed throughout the course and the readings. In other words, describe how the factors that motivate these employees align with or contradict the theories and ideas from class, and how your recommendations for what you would do to motivate the group are grounded in the material we have discussed. Make sure to include the contact information of the individuals on a separate page at the end of your essay so I can contact them, if necessary.
There are three primary objectives of this essay: 1) identify what the primary motivators are for each of the three employees you interviewed. There may be more than one for each employee. 2) give your thoughts about why each of the employees differs (if they do) from one another. 3) explain what you would do to motivate these individuals as if you are a manger of a group that contains each of the employees. The majority of your essay should be spent explaining how you would motivate this group and why you would use this particular approach. When doing this you will need to apply the theories and ideas that we have discussed in class, along with concepts from the readings and FBATR. Although you should strive to address each of the primary objectives separately, make sure that your paper is integrated into a coherent whole. This may mean that you refer back to something you mentioned in one of the other sections; also be sure to use transitions to move from one topic to another. Take time to plan your essay, organize the ideas you are presenting, and write concisely and carefully. One of the ways you can demonstrate that you learned from the class is to use the terminology of management correctly.
In your essay, consider how the experiences and motivations of these individuals connect to their performance at work (i.e., their organizational behavior). In what ways does your data confirm or disconfirm theoretical principles discussed in class and in the readings? Use the vocabulary from the class and be sure to explain the terms you use. What would you do to motivate these individuals; what are some of the possible pitfalls of your ideal course of action; are there multiple ways to accomplish this task; if so, what are they? Overall, the essay should reflect your insights about how motivating these employees fit with the ideas we have discussed in class. To conclude your essay, you should include a single summary paragraph that integrates what you learned about motivating employees from these interviews.
The essay will be 3-4 pages, single spaced, Times New Roman 12-point font, with one-inch margins for the top, bottom, and sides and no breaks between paragraphs. You must provide me with the names and contact numbers of each interviewee on the final page of the essay (this is a separate page that will not count against the page limit); I will keep their information completely confidential, but I want to have the ability to call them if sense that the interview did not actually take place. The essay will be graded on format, composition, spelling and punctuation, as well as the content. The assignment should be submitted via blackboard before the beginning of class on July 19. There will be a letter grade dock for late papers. Papers turned in 24 hours after the deadline will receive only half credit. Papers turned in 48 hours after the deadline will not receive any credit.
*Remember that presentation counts; sloppy and disorganized writing implies sloppy and disorganized thinking.
3
Possible Interview Questions (questions you may want to ask to understand what motivates this employee):
1. Please describe your responsibilities at work. How many people do you regularly work with?
Do you supervise anyone? Describe your average workday.
2. What are some of the things that you enjoy most about your job?
3. What motivates you to stay at this job?
4. What motivates you to perform well and give extra effort in your work?
5. Is there anything that you wish you could change about your job? What is it?
6. Is there anything that frustrates you about your coworkers or the organization you work for?
7. What is one way that you would improve your job if you could?
8. Do you know what is expected of you at work? How does that affect your motivation?
9. Do you have the materials and equipment you need to do your work right? How does that affect your motivation at work?
10. At work, do you have the opportunity to do what I do best every day? Why or why not?
11. In the last seven days, have you received recognition or praise for doing good work? How does that make you feel?
12. Does your supervisor, or someone at work, seems to care about you as a person? How does that affect your commitment to your job?
13. Is there someone at work who encourages your development? How does that make you feel?
14. At work, do your opinions seem to count? Why or why not?
15. Does the mission/purpose of your company make you feel your job is important? How does that relate to your motivation at work?
16. Are your coworkers are committed to doing quality work? How does that affect your work?
17. In the last six months, has someone at work talked to you about your progress? How did that make you feel?
18. This last year, have you had opportunities at work to learn and grow? How has that affected your work performance?
19. Does time pass quickly when you are at work? Why or why not?

. .

Buy Nursing Papers

The post Does the mission/purpose of your company make you feel your job is important? How does that relate to your motivation at work? appeared first on NURSING TERM PAPER HELP.

Expressed Need Expressed need refers to what can be inferred about the health need of a community by observation of the community’s use of services. (e.g. demand for a new service, long waiting lists). Expressed need can however be misinterpreted. A need may exist but because there is no service in place to meet it, the expressed need may not be identified. Furthermore, long waiting lists at a health service may be the result of inefficiency and not about the size of the group wanting to be treated.

Critique of a micro teaching session

Order Description

Critique of a micro teaching session
Watch that Video and Critique it
The video is (Norm Life be in it)

Norm life be in it

For the purpose of this assessment you will need to use the framework to identify if this advertisement is relevant for the health needs for 2015.
Using the framework identified by Bradshaw (1972) Typology of Needs you are required to critique and review the selected advertisement to identify the following:
1. Felt need (Was this a community need? This is normally identified by questioning members of the public to identify what people say they need or require
2. Expressed need (what is demonstrated by peoples use of services or demands for more services)
3. Normative need (determined by experts based on research and professional opinion: what does the literature say)
4. Comparative need (compare one geographical area to another: compare like Sydney to Melbourne, Albury and Bendigo) Similar demographics and differing services

WHAT ARE THE TYPES OF NEEDS?
Bradshaw (1972) suggests there are four dimensions or different types of need.
It is important to tap into each type of need to increase the chance of constructing a comprehensive picture of community problems.
1. Normative Need Normative need refers to what expert opinion based on research defines as need. For example, the National Health and Medical Research Council recommends all children aged 12 – 15 months be vaccinated against measles. This indicates a health need, if data indicates that many children are not immunised.
2. Expressed Need Expressed need refers to what can be inferred about the health need of a community by observation of the community’s use of services. (e.g. demand for a new service, long waiting lists). Expressed need can however be misinterpreted. A need may exist but because there is no service in place to meet it, the expressed need may not be identified. Furthermore, long waiting lists at a health service may be the result of inefficiency and not about the size of the group wanting to be treated.
3. Comparative Need Comparative need is derived from examining the services provided in one area to one population and using this information as the basis to determine the sort of services required in another area with a similar population. When assessing comparative need the level of service provision in the reference area must be appropriate in the first place. Be cautious that data collected may in fact be due to over-servicing or under-servicing by service providers rather than an indication of true need for the service by health consumers.
4. Felt Need Felt need is what people in your community say they want or feel they need. Common methods of assessing felt needs are household opinion surveys, phone-ins, public meetings and calling for submissions from those in the community. When determining felt needs, there are three things to note: • People have a tendency to express needs in terms of a solution eg. More nursing home beds. • People may be representing themselves or others. • The level of expectation in relation to services may influence felt need. (Source: Hawe, Degeling & Hall, 1990 / ACT Health Promotion 2009.

. .

Buy Nursing Papers

The post Expressed Need Expressed need refers to what can be inferred about the health need of a community by observation of the community’s use of services. (e.g. demand for a new service, long waiting lists). Expressed need can however be misinterpreted. A need may exist but because there is no service in place to meet it, the expressed need may not be identified. Furthermore, long waiting lists at a health service may be the result of inefficiency and not about the size of the group wanting to be treated. appeared first on NURSING TERM PAPER HELP.

You are clinical nurse scholars in the making. You are the advanced practice nurses and members of the highly literate profession of advanced practice nursing who will chart the future of health care. Good writing ability is as much a required skill for nurses in advanced practice as performing clinical functions. Therefore, precision and scholarship is expected in all assignments.

Critical Appraisal of Evidenced-based Guidlines

Treating Depression in Older Adults: Challenges to Implementing the Recommendations of an Expert Panel
Strictly APA by the publication manual of the American psychological association 6th edition second practice. Write in Third person only. Special attention to the reference page, title page Verb/noun agreement. Grammar is big. Masters level/DNP [doctor of nursing practice. Introduction and conclusions required. Use headings when needed. Thesis statement pivotal, conclusion critical
Articles and AGREE tool will be loaded after the bid. Please do not take this assignment if u don’t know how to critically appraise evidenced-based studies.
Critical Appraisal of Evidence-based Guidelines Select a guideline based on the IOM area of interest that you identified in the introduction thread. You will choose a critical appraisal tool (such as the AGREE tool, CASP, the CONSORT tool, the TREND statement, McMaster Critical review form, …) to critique the guideline. The tool must match the type of guideline chosen (TREND for non-randomized controlled trials, for example).
This assignment will provide you the opportunity to critically appraise evidence-based guidelines. You are continuing to advance your search and critically appraising selected evidence. Select an evidence based guideline from your initial and ongoing search. Use the various EBP Resources and Tools provided in the lesson to locate evidence based guidelines.
Rubric:
/3 selection of an appropriate appraisal tool, with justification
/2: Selection of an evidence-based guideline.
/10: Using criteria (AGREE tool, other resources), critically appraises each item (domain, category) of the evidence-based guideline, paying attention to levels of evidence used in developing guideline (consider grey literature as well).
/5: Categorize process and outcome measures using outcome evaluation methods.
/5: Conclusion: summary of the critique of the guidelines – not more than a page
/25
Additional points will be deducted:
Instructions:
A pdf copy of the assignment should also be uploaded in the assignment section of the course. approved title page should be used for the pdf copy of the assignment. 10% deduction for no, or late, pdf submission.
Please note: Up to 20% of points will be deducted from grade for lack of scholarship.
Scholarship Expectations
You are clinical nurse scholars in the making. You are the advanced practice nurses and members of the highly literate profession of advanced practice nursing who will chart the future of health care. Good writing ability is as much a required skill for nurses in advanced practice as performing clinical functions. Therefore, precision and scholarship is expected in all assignments.
Organized and logical progression of ideas; effort and attention to detail is evident; communicates effectively all aspect
I want to remind you to make sure that you reference where you learned what something is…Variables are XXX according to Polit and Beck (2011). The varibles identified in this study were..

. .

Buy Nursing Papers

The post You are clinical nurse scholars in the making. You are the advanced practice nurses and members of the highly literate profession of advanced practice nursing who will chart the future of health care. Good writing ability is as much a required skill for nurses in advanced practice as performing clinical functions. Therefore, precision and scholarship is expected in all assignments. appeared first on NURSING TERM PAPER HELP.

Demonstrate partial proficiency in written communication with few grammatical or syntax errors, but may be pitched at the wrong audience. 2 points

Research Methods for the Health Sciences;

Module 1 – Background
THE RESEARCH QUESTION, LITERATURE REVIEW, AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
Required Reading
Available via ProQuest:
Blazer, D.G. (2007). Religious beliefs, practices and mental health outcomes: What is the research question? American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 269-272. Retrieved February 23, 2012
Chien, A., Coker, T., Choi, L., Slora, E., Bodnar, P., Weiley, V., . . .Johnson, J. (2006).What do pediatric primary care providers think are important research questions? A perspective from PROS providers.Ambulatory Pediatrics, 6, 352-355. Retrieved February 23, 2012
Newton, J.T., Bower, E.J., & Williams, A.C. (2004). Research in primary dental care part 2: Developing a research question. British Dental Journal, 196, 605-608. Retrieved February 23, 2012

Module 1 – Case
THE RESEARCH QUESTION, LITERATURE REVIEW, AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
Case Assignment
Newton, Bower, and Williams (2004) outline the process of “devising and revising” a research question, be it descriptive, relational, or comparative. After reading their paper, write a three-page paper that addresses the following:
1. How do descriptive research questions differ from questions of relationship? From questions of comparison?
2. How should a researcher determine if prior research exists on her intended research topic?
3. What factors should be used to gauge the quality of previous research? Why are these important in making this assessment?
4. Should formulation of a research question precede or follow consultation with the scholarly literature? Please explain.
Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 3 pages typed, double-spaced.
Module 1 – SLP
THE RESEARCH QUESTION, LITERATURE REVIEW, AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
The SLP for this course is designed to allow you to apply the research concepts and principles introduced throughout this course to a “real-world” health problem. As such, you will be asked to devise your own research question, to use the empirical literature to identify knowledge gaps in the field with regard to that research question, formulate a corresponding research hypothesis, propose an appropriate study design for testing that research hypothesis, and devise a sampling and recruitment plan to strengthen the generalizability of your study’s findings. In Module 5, you will upload a final paper consisting of all of these elements.
Your Task for this Assignment
After reading the background materials for this module, select one of the following research topics and derive a corresponding research question. Next, write a 2- to 3-page paper in which you identify your research question and apply the “Attributes of a ‘Good’ Research Question”:
• Obesity and Diabetes Risk
• Physical Activity and Stroke Risk
• Health Insurance Status and Health Care Utilization
• Education and Mortality Risk
• Drug Addiction and Criminal Behavior
• Cancer Therapy [1] and Tumor Growth
Your paper should clearly delineate the extent to which each of the following criteria has been satisfied in formulating your research question:
• Relevance
• Novelty
• Focus
• Consisting of two core concepts (at minimum)
• Feasibility
SLP Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 2-3 pages typed, double-spaced.
Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information.
[1] Select a specific therapy type, e.g., gene therapy, chemotherapy, etc.
Module 2 – Background
STUDY DESIGNS
Required Reading
Available via the Internet:
Jepsen, P., Johnsen, S.P., Gillman, M.W., & Sorensen, H.T. (2004). Interpretation of observational studies. Heart, 90,956-960. Retrieved from http://heart.bmj.com/content/90/8/956.full.pdf Retrieved February 23, 2012.
Module 2 – Case
STUDY DESIGNS
Case Assignment
Health science researchers have long believed the randomized controlled trial (RCT) to be the “gold standard” of study designs. There are many reasons for their contention that an RCT should be preferred to any of the observational study designs. However, there are also instances in which employment of this design would be inappropriate.
In a four-page paper, discuss the merits of the RCT as a study design with regard to:
1. Internal validity
2. Confounding
3. Feasibility/appropriateness
4. External validity
Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 4 pages typed, double-spaced.
Module 2 – SLP
STUDY DESIGNS
The next step in the research process is immersing oneself in the empirical literature on your research topic to determine the extent to which your research question (identified in Module 1) has been addressed. To this end, please use the Trident University Online Library to conduct a literature search on your research topic.
Remember, your goal is to discover the extent to which a knowledge gap exists with regard to your specific research question. Locate five peer-reviewed journal articles that present studies relevant to your topic, and synthesize these into a four-page paper that summarizes the “current state of knowledge” with regard to your research question. Note specifically,
1. Study findings relative your research question (positive, negative, and inconclusive)
2. Any additional questions left unanswered by these studies
3. How addressing your research question would help to fill a knowledge gap (should your research question fall short of this, you may need to propose an alternative one)
4. The specific population to which your study will apply (and ultimately, your study’s targeted sample)
SLP Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 4 pages typed, double-spaced.
Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information.
Module 3 – Background
SAMPLING
Required Reading
Available via ProQuest:
Nokes, K.M., & Nwakeze, P.C. (2007). Exploring research issues: In using a random sampling plan with highly marginalized populations. The Journal of Multicultural Nursing and Health, 13(1), 6-9. Retrieved February 23, 2012
Wolf, H.K., Kuulasma, K., Tolonen, H., Sans, S., Molarius, A., & Eastwood, B.J. (2005). Effect of sampling frames on response rates in the WHO MONICA risk factor surveys. European Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 293-299. Retrieved February 23, 2012
Available via the Internet:
Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). Sampling terminology. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/sampterm.php Retrieved February 23, 2012
Module 3 – Case
SAMPLING
Case Assignment
Read the background materials for this module and, after doing so, address the following questions in a four-page paper:
1. The sampling frame is arguably the most critical element of a study’s sampling plan. Why is this so?
2. How might a poorly specified sampling frame forestall the research process?
3. Are studies that employ convenience sampling invalid? Please explain.
4. Of the sampling methods presented in this module, which optimize external validity (if this term is unfamiliar, revisit the Module 2 home page)? Please explain.
Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 4 pages typed, double-spaced.
Module 3 – SLP
SAMPLING
Suppose that your research topic is “milk consumption and bone fracture risk.” A corresponding research question would thus be: “What is the relationship between daily consumption of milk and bone fracture risk?”
A review of the empirical literature suggests that milk consumption may decrease the likelihood of bone fracture, but findings reported are limited to women ages 65 and above. You would like to examine this relationship in a different segment of the population; let’s say school-aged youths. Given that prior research suggests a relationship exists, you might hypothesize the following:
Research Hypothesis (one-tailed):
Ho: School-aged youths who consume milk on a daily basis are equally as likely or more likely (than those who do not) to experience bone fractures.
Ha: School-aged youths who consume milk on a daily basis are less likely to experience bone fractures.
…where Ho reflects the null hypothesis and Ha the alternative hypothesis, which corresponds to the outcome that you, the researcher, expect to observe. Another way of stating your hypothesis would be in two-tailed format, i.e.,
Research Hypothesis (two-tailed):
Ho: There is no relationship between daily milk consumption and bone fracture risk among school-aged youths.
Ha: There is a relationship between daily milk consumption and bone fracture risk among school-aged youths.
(Two-tailed hypotheses are used in instances in which a research is not able to anticipate the direction of a hypothesized relationship.)
Your Specific Task for this Assignment
Using the examples provided about, formulate your own research hypothesis corresponding to the research question you selected in Module 1. Add this to the previous components of your SLP, ensuring that there is consistency from research question-to-literature review-to- research hypothesis. (Your research hypothesis should correspond directly to your research question; if this is not the case, please revise either accordingly.)
Upload the resultant document, which should be 6-7 pages in length, for my review.
SLP Assignment Expectations
• Ensure that there is alignment across the three components of your project, i.e., research question, literature review, research hypothesis.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 6-7 pages typed, double-spaced.
Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information.
Module 4 – Background
TYPES OF VARIABLES
Required Reading
Available via the Internet:
Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). Variables. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/variable.php Retrieved February 23, 2012
Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). Levels of measurement. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/measlevl.php Retrieved February 23, 2012
Module 4 – Case
TYPES OF VARIABLES
Case Assignment
A researcher wishes to operationalize her study variables in the following manner. How might she go about doing so? Summarize your responses in tabular form (see example below), and supplement your table with a supporting narrative.
• Age (continuous)
• Gender (dichotomous)
• Ethnicity (categorical)
• Education (ordinal)
• Income (continuous)
• Marital status (categorical)
• Weight (continuous)
• Blood pressure (continuous)
• Hypertension (dichotomous)
• Body temperature (continuous)
• Health insurance status (categorical)
• Smoking status (dichotomous)
• Cancer Stage (ordinal)
EXAMPLE:
Variable:
Name Type How operationalized How measured
Age
Etc. continuous Age in years How old were you on your last birthday?
Narrative: When age is operationalized in this manner, one would merely need to query the respondent to determine the age she turned on her last birthday. Alternatively, the researcher could ask the respondent to provide his birth date and year, and then calculate age at a later time.
Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to incorporate relevant background readings into your responses.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at theend. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 2-3 pages typed, double-spaced.
Module 4 – SLP
TYPES OF VARIABLES
Once a research hypothesis is formulated, the researcher must decide upon an appropriate study design to test that hypothesis. In doing so, she must take into consideration the extent to which that design will optimize the internal validity of her study findings (refer again the discussion of internal validity in Module 2). Also to be considered are the practical factors that may facilitate or inhibit implementation of particular study designs, e.g., limited access to one’s target population over time due to transiency among prospective research subjects may preclude adoption of a cohort study design.
Your Task for this Assignment
With the aforementioned factors in mind, identify a study design (experimental or observational) that would be appropriate to test your study’s research hypothesis, and address the following questions in a three-page essay:
1. What are the components of this design?
2. Would this design be considered experimental or observational? Why?
3. Why did you choose this design over others? Be sure to note all advantages and disadvantages of employing this design to address your particular research question.
4. To what types of bias is this design most vulnerable? Please explain.
SLP Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 3 pages typed, double-spaced.
Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information.
Module 5 – Background
DATA ANALYSIS
Required Reading
Available via ProQuest:
Song, H., Han, H., Lee, J., Kim, J, Kim, K.B., Ryu, J.P., & Kim, M. (2010). Does access to care still affect health care utilization by immigrants? Testing of an empirical explanatory model of health care utilization by Korean American immigrants with high blood pressure. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health, 12, 513-519. Retrieved February 23, 2012
Available via the Internet:
Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). Descriptive statistics. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statdesc.php Retrieved February 23, 2012
Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). Correlation. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/statcorr.php Retrieved February 23, 2012
Trochim, W.M.K. (2006). The T-Test. Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/stat_t.php Retrieved February 23, 2012
Module 5 – Case
DATA ANALYSIS
Case Assignment
Please read the following article, and address the questions that appear below in a four- page paper:
Song, H., Han, H., Lee, J., Kim, J, Kim, K.B., Ryu, J.P., & Kim, M. (2010). Does access to care still affect health care utilization by immigrants? Testing of an empirical explanatory model of health care utilization by Korean American immigrants with high blood pressure. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health, 12, 513-519.
1. What research question did the authors set out to answer?
2. What research hypothesis was tested in this study?
3. What study design was employed in the study? What (if any) type of bias is inherent to this design?
4. Summarize the univariate findings displayed in Table 1.
5. Summarize the bivariate findings reported in Table 2.
6. What limitations were noted with regard to the study’s findings and conclusions?
Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to incorporate relevant background readings into your responses.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 4 pages typed, double-spaced.
Module 5 – SLP
DATA ANALYSIS
Before any study can be undertaken, the researcher must determine what exactly will constitute the study’s target population, sample frame, and sample (if any of these terms is unfamiliar to you, I strongly encourage you to revisit the discussion of sampling in Module 3 as this information provides the foundation necessary to complete this SLP assignment). Also to be considered how he will go about recruiting subjects into his study.
Your Task for this Assignment
Discuss the following as it pertains to your study in 3-4 pages; incorporate this discussion into a 12-15 page final paper consisting of all prior SLP components.
1. A sampling plan for your study to address the research question your chose in Module 1. Be sure to outline clearly your study’s-
a. target population
b. sampling frame
c. sample
2. A recruitment strategy for enlisting participation prospective research subjects in your study
SLP Assignment Expectations
• You are expected to consult the scholarly literature in preparing your paper; you are also expected to incorporate relevant background readings.
• Your paper should be written in your own words. This will enable me to assess your level of understanding.
• In order to earn full credit, you must clearly show that you have read ALL required background materials.
• Be sure to cite your references in the text of all papers and on the reference list at the end. For examples, look at the way the references are listed in the modules and on the background reading list.
• Proofread your paper to be sure grammar and punctuation are correct and that each part of the assignment has been address clearly and completely.
Length: 12-15 pages typed, double-spaced.
Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information.
MSHS Information Literacy Rubric:
Criteria Level 4 – Excellent Level 3 – Proficient Level 2 – Developing Level 1 – Emerging
Assignment-Driven Criteria 20 points
Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way. 17 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment. 15 points
Demonstrates partial proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment. 12 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment.
Use of Information to Support Arguments (effective use of information): The student effectively uses resources to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work. 10 points
Demonstrates mastery in retrieving information, using strong and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic, and shape the whole work. 9 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency in retrieving information, and in using appropriate and relevant content to support ideas, and convey understanding of the topic. Few arguments left unsupported. 7 points
Demonstrates partial proficiency to retrieve information and use of relevant content to support ideas, but leaves many arguments unsupported. May use immaterial or disparate content in an attempt to support arguments. 6 points
Demonstrates inability to retrieve information, or use appropriate or relevant content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work. Makes unsupported arguments and assertions.
Citing Sources: The student effectively cites sources. 5 points
Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations of sources, proper format for quotations, and correctly format full source information in the reference list using APA style (bibliography). 4 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency using of in-text citations of sources, proper format for quotations, and provides sufficient source information in the reference list, though not in APA format (bibliography). 3 points
Demonstrates occasional use of in-text citations of sources and provides partial reference information (bibliography). 2 points
Demonstrates inability to cite sources or provide full source information in the reference list (bibliography).
Scholarly Writing: The student communicates proficiently with others through scholarly writing and skilled, knowledgeable presentation to general and specialized audiences. 5 points
Demonstrates mastery in scholarly written communication and a skilled and knowledgeable presentation to an appropriately specialized audience. 4 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency in written communication with well-organized presentation to an appropriately specialized audience. 3 points
Demonstrate partial proficiency in written communication with few grammatical or syntax errors, but may be pitched at the wrong audience. 2 points
Demonstrates limited or poor ability to write clearly using poor grammar and syntax. Text is disorganized and rambling.
Critical Thinking: The student develops skills to critically evaluate information sources. 10 points
Demonstrates mastery in critically evaluating information sources. 9 points
Demonstrates considerable proficiency in critically evaluating information sources. 7 points
Demonstrates some ability to critically evaluate information sources. 6 points
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency to critically evaluate information sources.
Overall Score Level 4
45 or more Level 3
40 or more Level 2
35 or more Level 1
0 or more

. .

Buy Nursing Papers

The post Demonstrate partial proficiency in written communication with few grammatical or syntax errors, but may be pitched at the wrong audience. 2 points appeared first on NURSING TERM PAPER HELP.

Do you think the outcome of the data would be different if the researchers used the population that is available on your unit?

Research article

The purpose of this paper is to encourage the use of recent nursing research in the obstetric field and identify how it can be utilized in the clinical area. Any subject matter in maternity nursing: antepartum, labor and delivery, nursery, postpartum home care, fetal monitoring, birthing centers, nurse-midwifery, etc. are available for research.
Choose a research study that has been done in your area of interest. They can be found in Nursing Research, JOGNN, MCN, AJN or any other nursing journal. But must be a nursing journal no exceptions! Analyze the results and see if they have been applied in the clinical area you have been assigned to in this course.
In this paper, you will be graded by these standards:
? What was the purpose of the study and the population that was used?
? What was the outcome of the data collected?
? How is the data utilized on your clinical unit?
? How could it be better applied or, if not at all, how could you implement it?
? Do you think the outcome of the data would be different if the researchers used the population that is available on your unit?
Each of the answers is worth 2 points for a total score of 10. This paper is worth 10% of your grade. Please attach a copy of the article to the paper.

. .

Buy Nursing Papers

The post Do you think the outcome of the data would be different if the researchers used the population that is available on your unit? appeared first on NURSING TERM PAPER HELP.